(Enid Blyton, Upper Fourth at Malory Towers, Methuen, 1949, p119)
The idea for the research which became the Virtual
Worlds of Girls hypertext cluster arose when I discovered a box of
Angela Brazil's (1869-1947) girls' school stories, being sold for a few
pence each, in an antique shop in Lynton, North Devon in January 1984.
I was spending a few days with my partner's family and had already run
out of books to read; like many of the women who collect girls' school
stories,
I am an avid reader and will resort to the back of the cornflakes packet
if nothing else is available. It is true to say that, coming from a lower-middle-class
background,
I would not automatically have thought of these books as worth buying from
any other perspective, although, in common with other British schoolgirls,
I had devoured school stories as a child. However, a schoolfriend's father
- a local headmaster - had amassed a fine collection of British boys' school
stories in the 1970s, and this gave me the idea of starting a similar collection.
dev1
Six months prior to my rediscovery of Angela Brazil's
girls' school stories in 1984, I had graduated from the University of East
Anglia after reading English Studies and Film Studies. Since then I had
founded and edited a community zine
for young people in Norwich, and was shortly to take up an appointment
in London, founding and editing a community newspaper funded by the Greater
London Council.
Financially I was in no position to continue with my education, but I decided
that I would begin to collect other books in the genre with a view to carrying
out research in the future.
dev2
Over the next four years I built up my collection, scouring
secondhand book shops, charity shops, flea markets, car boot sales and
jumble sales for examples of the genre. Most of this (re)search was carried
out on holidays and at weekends, and my partner became used to stopping
the car in every town or village that appeared to offer possibilities,
euphemistically described by me as places where "you could probably get
a nice cup of tea". It was only when I discovered the girls' school story
fan networks
in 1993 that I realised this was a shared experience; I also found that
the dream of going into a bookshop and discovering all of the books which
I sought were on sale for a few pence each was a common one!
dev3
After four years of collecting, in 1988 I resigned from
my editing job at the housing charity Shelter to become a freelance journalist
and began to explore the possibilities for beginning my research formally,
if part-time. Few institutions showed much interest in my subject, but
eventually I found a home in the School for Independent Study at the North
East London Polytechnic (now the University of East London). This innovative
department, sadly now defunct, allowed students to design their own courses,
producing a formal proposal for a programme of study at the end of their
first term. Once this proposal had been approved by the Council for National
Academic Awards,
students spent a minimum of the equivalent of a year's full-time study
before producing written or other work for assessment.
dev4
When I entered the school I wanted to research into the
genre as a whole, as had always been my original intention. However, I
was told that the subject was too vast for a Master's degree, so I restricted
my proposal to books by one author, Elinor M. Brent-Dyer (1894-1969). Written
between 1925 and 1969, Brent-Dyer's 59 Chalet School books
form the most successful children's series ever published in the United
Kingdom. In the late 1970s the publishing house Armada (owned by HarperCollins
by the 1990s) had begun a programme of republishing the entire series in
paperback, and from 1984 I had collected the books as they were published.
The series seemed ideally suited to be a research subject, since its appeal
had spanned more than half a century - in the 1980s the series still commonly
sold more than 100,000 copies a year in the UK. I knew that many of the
paperback editions had been abridged and updated (although I did not realise
the extent to which this had been done until I met collectors who owned
first editions). However, I was most interested in the elements of the
stories which ensured their continuing popularity, and it seemed reasonable
to assume that these were still contained within the paperbacks. In any
case, I did not originally intend to complete my Master's degree. Instead,
with the support of my supervisor, Maggie Humm,
after a year or so I intended to upgrade my registration to a PhD, and
so widen the research to cover the genre as a whole.
dev5
In the event, though, I became much more severely disabled
in May 1990.
At this time I was working as a television documentary researcher,
but it soon became obvious that I was not fit enough to continue. My future
was unpredictable (it took until 1993 to obtain a correct diagnosis), and
I decided that my most productive option in the short term was to complete
my Master's degree. Between my health and the continuing need to earn money,
this work took until March 1992. My thesis, A World of Girls - Schoolgirl
Fiction: Genre, Femininity and the Chalet School (part-republished
here as 6. The World of the Chalet School,
examined the extent to which the series represents contemporary constructs
of femininity and the extent to which it subverts them.
dev6
In March 1992 I received the degree of Master of Arts
by Independent Study in the field of Cultural Studies, and I decided to
continue my studies full time. By this time it was apparent that there
was now a great deal more academic interest in school stories than there
had been in 1988, perhaps as a result of the publication of Rosemary Auchmuty's
"You're a Dyke, Angela! Elsie J. Oxenham and the rise and fall of the schoolgirl
story" in 1989 (in Lesbian History Group, Not a Passing Phase: Reclaiming
Lesbians in History 1840-1985, The Women's Press, pp119-140). This
meant that I had a much wider choice of where to study, and in October
1992 I took up a place in the Department of Communication and Image Studies
at the University of Kent at Canterbury (UKC), to research into the reasons
for the continuing popularity of the genre as a whole.
dev7
Since it is not possible to write for a gender-free reader, and since the subject of my research was girls' books and the images associated with it are predominantly of girls and women, I took it that the primary reader of my research findings would be female. As a feminist, I decided to take feminists' and women's interests as being the same, and thus feminist research methods and the beliefs which characterise feminist research were important in developing my methodology. Shulamit Reinharz identifies ten themes which characterise feminist research methodology, all of which are in some way applicable to Virtual Worlds of Girls.
Liz Stanley and Sue Wise point out that:
Feminists embarking on important research projects are like people setting out on important journeys. As the journey continues, they draw on different methods or tools . . .
Feminism supplies the perspective and the disciplines supply the method. The feminist researcher exists at their intersection . . .
there is no single "feminist way" to do research . . .
Feminist research is amoeba-like; it goes everywhere, in every direction. It reaches into all the disciplines and uses all the methods, sometimes singly and sometimes in combinations.
(Reinharz also points out that:
Rather than locating my research within one discipline, such as English or History, I decided to draw on a number of related disciplines. Reinharz points out that there is:
Feminists seem particularly drawn to work on the borders of, and outside, their fields. As "connected knowers," we live in two worlds and find ways of bridging or blending disciplines.
In my initial research proposal, I decided first to carry out text-based research, both into the primary texts and into relevant parodic, historical and critical works. Reinharz points out that: "The 'nasty tendency' by which a culture teaches us to privilege some types of information and invalidate others becomes apparent in feminist subversive intertextual reading." This text-based research would involve deconstructing the genre and relevant parodic, historical and critical works, using discourse analysis. As Reinharz points out:
Next I would investigate the reading experiences of current and past child readers of the genre and of current adult readers. Janice Radway points out, in Reading the Romance (1987), that: "if literature is to be treated as a document in the study of a culture, it is first necessary to know something about who reads, why they do so, and how they go about it." However, in the introduction to the British edition of her book, she adds that:
However, although I kept to this research plan in terms
of the text-based research, by the beginning of 1993 it was clear that
the focus of my final thesis should be the relationship between the genre
and the outside world: fans; critics; and parodists. I had already identified
key reasons for the popularity of the genre within my MA research, as had
Auchmuty, who had also identified the underlying reason for the cultural
hostility towards the genre. Biographical studies of the major authors
were already in existence; a number of literary studies of individual authors
had been produced since 1988 or were now in progress; and my own field
in any case was Communication and Image Studies rather than English Literature
or History. Meanwhile no specific research had been carried out into the
critical attitudes towards and parodies of the genre, nor into how and
why girls and women continued to read the books regardless of almost universal
condemnation and ridicule. It was also important to acknowledge, examine
and answer past criticisms of the genre, rather than simply to offer an
alternative viewpoint and to ask the reader to accept it. This change of
focus, of course, also altered the emphasis of my methodology.
dev14
At the time when I produced my initial research proposal,
I had not come into contact with any other collectors of girls' school
stories, although I knew from contact with secondhand book dealers during
my MA research that there were at least a hundred women collecting the
books within the UK. My plan had therefore been to contact collectors through
these book dealers, and to contact girls reading the books today through
two secondary schools (one comprehensive, one girls' public boarding school).
I had then planned to carry out a sociological oral research project, basing
the methodology on the work of Radway, who conducted research in the mid-1980s
among adult women reading romance genre fiction in the USA,
and of Gill Frith, who conducted research in the early 1980s among young
girls in British comprehensive schools reading Enid Blyton's girls' school
stories.
dev15
This methodology would have included the use of questionnaires and individual and group interviews, using video tape to record the interviews. Reinharz points out that:
. . . The versatility of feminist interviewing is evident in the vast array of topics studied . . . The particulars of interviewing vary widely as well . . .
Other practical details also vary widely.
. . . This variety reflects the fact that feminist research methods are both rooted in the mainstream disciplines and represent a protest against them . . . Eschewing standardization in format allows the research question, not the method, to drive the project forward. It has also encouraged creativity.
But by 1993 my research had brought
me into contact with a number of women who collected girls' school stories
and ran associated fan clubs and fanzines,
and I had become aware that there were hundreds of girls and women (but
predominantly women) in the UK and elsewhere who were already organising,
meeting and networking around their book collecting, and writing about
it in their own publications. I was also aware that a committee had been
formed to organise a number of celebrations in the UK in 1994 to commemorate
the birth centenary of Elinor M. Brent-Dyer (1894-1969),
the author of the Chalet School series.
dev17
So now I realised that part of my planned approach was
redundant. Rather than asking readers to complete questionnaires, it would
be more valid and in keeping with feminist research methodology to analyse
the writing which the fans were producing themselves. (In doing this I
also considered the context in which it was produced, since Reinharz warns
that we should ask: "who is speaking when women speak for themselves? .
. . we have been naive in not analysing the conditions under which voices
are speaking . . . their very production may be a form of oppression.")
And rather than contacting readers through book dealers and schools and
then conducting group interviews, it would be far more valid and in keeping
with feminist research methodology to contact fans through their own networks
and to observe and record the activities which they were organising for
themselves.
dev18
Humm points out that: "Feminist researchers use a method called 'dialogic retrospection', which is defined as an open and active exchange between the researcher and participant in a partnership of co-research." In practice, this involved my joining the networks and participating in their activities as "one of us", although I made it clear to both the organisers and the fans from the start that a primary motivation for this was to obtain material for my PhD research, and that the level of my involvement would be dependent on this. (For example, I might record a quiz on video rather than taking part in it.) Reinharz points out that:
Feminist ethnographers who emphasize closeness rather than distance in fieldwork relations believe that understanding based on participant observation is enhanced by total immersion in the world one is studying. Total immersion comes about when the researcher begins to share the fate of those she is studying.
. . . to the extent that a goal of feminist scholarship is to reinterpret or redefine phenomena previously defined from a masculinist perspective, the only way to have access to a new definition is to truly understand the women by way of rapport . . .
By achieving rapport, the feminist researcher reassures herself that she is treating the interviewee in a nonexploitative manner. Rapport thus validates the scholar as a feminist, as a researcher, and as a human being. It symbolizes her sisterhood, her interviewing skill and her ethical standing.
I
joined the Friends of the Chalet School, which developed over the period
of my research from a newsletter of the same name into what was effectively
a society; and subscribed to The Chaletian (also for fans of Elinor
M. Brent-Dyer's Chalet School series); Folly (Friends of Light Literature
for the Young, which covers girls' school stories and other genres); The
Abbey Chronicle (for fans of Elsie J. Oxenham); and Serendipity
(for fans of Dorita Fairlie Bruce). In 1995 I also joined the newly founded
New Chalet Club, publishers of The New Chalet Club Journal. As well
as attending the Elinor M. Brent-Dyer centenary celebrations and reading
the newsletters, I attended a number of other fan gatherings, principally
those held in London as these were most accessible to me.
dev20
At
the beginning of 1994, Chalet fans in London and the South East began meeting
regularly for informal social gatherings, as did fans elsewhere, with dates
and venues being advertised in the newsletters or fanzines. Meetings generally
took place in the afternoon or evening, and included a meal and something
to drink. Numbers varied from three or four fans to thirty or more depending
on the geographical location, meaning that in cities such as London and
Edinburgh, meetings took place in pub rooms and wine bars, while in other
areas fans met at each other's houses. Fans would bring books to show and/or
to sell, and would usually hold a quiz about the life and/or work of Elinor
M. Brent-Dyer. Fans of the other authors met similarly, if less frequently,
and "Abbey" fans began holding regular folk dance evenings. Fans also met
in groups to visit venues mentioned in the genre, either on day trips or
longer stays, and I took part in these where I was able. In addition, fans
began socialising together outside of the networks, for example by eating
out together regularly, and I was often invited to attend some of these
gatherings too.
dev21
As
well as the revision of my research plans, coming into contact with the
organised collecting networks affected the focus of my research into reading
experiences. For one thing, I would be able to spend a great deal more
time with the collectors/readers than I envisaged when I produced my original
research proposal (I eventually spent more than two years in close contact
with them), and I believed that they were worthy of recording and studying
closely in themselves. Although there are over a hundred similar networks
or "literary societies" in the UK,
none have previously been the subject of an academic study, and as they
are largely a late twentieth century phenomenon, they may not survive into
the twenty-first century. In order to keep the research within manageable
levels and to give it a central focus, though, I decided to restrict my
findings and conclusions to the members of the networks. I would discuss
the extent to which my findings were likely to be true of all readers,
and the sample size would be large enough (through the collecting networks
I had contact with more than 1,000 women) to make this a valid approach.
dev22
Recording
and studying the networks closely would also demonstrate something which
had been implicit in my original research proposal,
the extent to which the genre continues to be popular today. In addition,
the fact that these networks were almost exclusively composed of women
meant that studying them was directly connected to the feminist nature
of my research. In particular, studying them would allow me to extend my
research into the relationship between the reasons for the genre's popularity
and the positive images of women and the importance of girls' friendships
within it. One important issue to consider would be whether the networks
were attempting to recreate analogous groups of friends as adult women
in the real world. (See The Fans of Girls' School Stories, 1990s Women
Fans for details of my findings.)
dev23
At the same time, I could expand my original plans to
record the oral research on video tape. As well as keeping to my proposal
to record interviews, I could also record the events organised to celebrate
Elinor M. Brent-Dyer's birth centenary. While I would control the situation
during the interviews, the readers themselves would be in control when
I was recording the centenary events. Later I was able to arrange to record
the bulk of the interviews during these events. This allowed the interviewees
to feel more comfortable and relaxed than if they had been interviewed
at a venue which I had chosen or if they had had to allow a stranger into
their home, and also meant that they were very focused on the Chalet School
series when the interviews took place.
dev24
(Ann Oakley warns feminists of the unfeminist nature of
traditional interviewing techniques. These strive to exclude interaction
with the interviewee, although Oakley adds that this is unattainable, since
it is impossible to be so detached. The traditional process is also hierarchical,
with the interviewee being subordinate and gaining nothing, and Oakley
regards this as being politically unacceptable. Instead she advocates a
process where power relationships are equated as much as possible, for
example by the interviewer responding to all of the interviewee's questions.
Janet Finch, though, points out that when a woman is interviewing another
woman, both, as women, are subordinate in our culture. However, the interviewer
is still in control, and carries a responsibility to use the information
gained in a way that is not prejudicial to the interests of the interviewees
or any other women.)
dev25
In order to keep the research within manageable levels,
I abandoned my tentative plans to use video to "explore further the images
of femininity represented in the books and parodic images of the genre
in other media"
and decided to restrict the video work to readers of the Chalet School
series. Since my MA thesis
had been based on the Chalet School, I already had a detailed knowledge
of the books which should assist during the filming process. The centenary
would also provide the video material with a focus and allow me to present
it as a one-hour documentary, while the use of video itself would make
the research accessible to those for whom the written material would not
be.
dev26
Another reason why I wished to use video was to allow the readers whom I was researching to be directly represented within my research. Reinharz points out that:
In a very blatant way, it brings the audience in for direct observation of the material the researcher wants to present . . . When the interviewees "speak for themselves" or "use their own voice", the reader is better able to understand.
However, the extent to which video allows this is largely illusory, since I would first select what to record and later decide what to include in and exclude from the final presentation. And, since I would be behind the camera, I would not appear in the final presentation although I was responsible for creating it. Denise Farran points out that:
First, there would have been other people in the setting. At a minimum there must have been the photographer . . .
Second, as well as not seeing the process of taking the photograph itself, one product, we don't see the process [of preparing to have the photograph taken].
. . . Feminist oral histories concerned with clarifying the different voices find ways of highlighting the dialogue and sharing that occurred.
I also decided that I would discuss the resulting video presentation within the final hyperthesis, making my own interpretations explicit. Reinharz states that:
After ongoing contact with the organised collecting networks,
two more aspects became apparent which were also worthy of studying. First,
many readers created craft and artwork inspired by the books: I therefore
decided to contact as many of these women as possible in order to ask them
about their work and to photograph or to obtain photographs of it. Second,
it became obvious that the presentation of the text - including typography,
dust wrappers and illustrations - and its physical embodiment in the printed
book played a part in collecting.
dev30
Unfortunately, I was unable to gain access easily to many
examples of the original books, which were often the only editions to contain
illustrations. This was because it was difficult to obtain these from anyone
but the professional dealers (I have discussed my difficulties in using
libraries elsewhere),
and I could not afford their prices. It was also clear that the scope of
my original research was already so wide that I could not afford to carry
out a detailed study of the illustrations; I could only note the phenomenon
and explore it a little. To do this I was able to borrow a large number
of dustwrappers from Gill Bilski, a dealer, Clarissa Cridland, co-organiser
of Friends of the Chalet School, and Helen McClelland, Brent-Dyer's biographer,
and I included these within the film The Chalet School Revisited.
I was also able to obtain line drawings from books owned by Sue Sims, co-editor
of Folly, to illustrate the hyperthesis.
dev31
One aspect of the collecting networks
which did initially cause me difficulty was the fact that the overwhelming
majority of members were over the age of eighteen. Unsuprisingly, given
that up to 100,000 Chalet School paperbacks were regularly sold each year
during the 1980s and early 1990s, there were younger members of
the Chalet School networks. However, the events and fanzines were aimed
at the adult members, and nothing was organised separately for girls reading
the books today. The solution to this difficulty arose after I filmed six
of the younger fans, on 24 October 1994 (see Making The Chalet School
Revisited, 4. Production for details).
At the end of the filming, the girls requested that I continued to hold
regular meetings for them during the school holidays. Rather than continue
simply to use the girls as subjects of my research, I was therefore able
to offer them my help in facilitating group contact which they themselves
desired; I felt that this was much more in keeping with feminist research
methodology.
dev32
Accordingly, I set up the Chalet School girls' group,
open to any member of the fan networks who was under the age of eighteen
and able to attend a meeting in central London. I was provided with a list
of junior members living in London and the South East by Friends of the
Chalet School which I used as a mailing list; I continued to invite girls
even if they failed to respond. As all of the girls were under the age
of eighteen, the invitations included a form for parents or guardians to
sign and return, giving permission for the girls to attend and taking responsibility
for providing them with transport to and from the venue and a packed lunch.
I also ensured that I was joined by at least one other adult during the
meetings, so that the girls were never left unaccompanied even in the event
of an emergency. Anne Thompson, a retired teacher who had played this role
during the filming, was my most regular helper and proved popular with
the girls. The group soon established itself with a core of ten girls,
aged between ten and eighteen years, and continued to meet in the Wheel's
theatre in central London each school holiday. Meetings took place between
11am and 4pm on Monday 20 February 1995, Monday 24 April 1995, Sunday 9
July 1995 (this took place in a studio at the Drill Hall in Chenies Street,
as the Wheel was not open at the weekends), Monday 23 October 1995 and
Monday 19 February 1996.
dev33
When I first invited girls to take part in the filming,
I had suggested that activities might include "a Chalet School quiz, progressive
games [these are popular in the series] and acting" (archived correspondence,
26 September 1994). These suggestions had been supported on feedback forms
which were included with permission slips, and continued to form the main
part of each day. Typically, girls arrived and, after being introduced
as necessary, had a sticker placed on their backs with the name of a Chalet
School character written on it. They then had to find out "Who am I?" from
the other girls, who could only answer "yes" or "no" to questions such
as "Am I in the Austrian books?" and "Was I a prefect?". This game was
highly successful in overcoming the girls' initial shyness - all of the
girls were intimidated when they arrived, and unsurprisingly this continued
as time went on because of the infrequency of the meetings and the wide
geographical area which the girls came from. The girls were also self-selected
keen readers, who therefore spent less time in social situations than other
girls.
dev34
Following "Who am I?", we sat in a circle and Anne and
I led a discussion with the girls, talking, for example, about how their
real-life experiences reflected and differed from those portrayed in the
Chalet School series. Afterwards we played acting games, primarily Chalet
School charades. This allowed the girls to behave more physically and to
express any feelings which might have arisen out of the discussion; it
also allowed them to copy the Chalet School girls whose plays are detailed
in almost every book. Initially I also considered using drama more formally,
but this would have put pressure on the girls to perform rather than them
enjoying the acting for its own sake. As the meetings progressed, though,
the girls also produced adaptations of scenes from the books in which they
directed themselves.
dev35
At
lunchtime we formed a circle again and talked while we ate, before continuing
with a game such as Kim's Game or a Chalet School quiz. Initially these
quizzes were taken from those devised for the main fan meetings, but later
the girls devised their own. In the afternoon, the girls continued to act
or to take part in activities adapted from the series, for example by making
paper hats out of newspapers in a variation on the Chalet School's "sheets
and pillowcases parties", before closing with games such as Chinese Whispers.
dev36
At the girls' request, I did not continue to record their activities during the meetings, although they were happy for me to make notes afterwards. However, I encouraged the girls to produce their own writing about the series and the reasons for their fandom which I could analyse instead; this in any case seemed to me to be more in keeping with feminist research methodology. On 2 August 1995 I wrote to all of the girls who had attended at least one meeting and invited them to write me an essay during the summer holiday on "The Chalet School and I", making it clear that this would be used in my PhD research. The names of everyone who responded would be drawn for prizes which all entrants would receive; this gave the girls an incentive but also ensured that they were rewarded for their co-operation. First prize was my first edition of The Head Girl of the Chalet School (1928), other prizes included beadwork Chalet School bookmarks and badges. I asked the girls to try to answer the following questions within their essays, which were topics which we had already discussed during the meetings.
At Anne Thompson's suggestion, we also encouraged the
girls to produce their own magazine, as the fictional girls and the adult
women fans had already done. Accordingly, the main purpose of the fourth
meeting, on 9 July 1995, was "to finalise the first issue of our newsletter,
The
Chalet School Today" (archived correspondence, 10 June 1995). In the
event, this was published in autumn 1995 in Issue 1 of The New Chalet
Club Journal, as a pull-out section printed on different coloured paper
to the main body of text. Unlike the earlier organisations, the recently
founded Club had decided to include younger members wherever possible within
its activities, and had set aside a place for a Junior Co-ordinator on
its Committee, electing Moira Lovegrove, the oldest girl in our group,
to the position.
dev38
The
first issue of The Chalet School Today set the pattern for others.
A typical issue included most of the following: a report of the last meeting;
a short story; a quiz; jokes; pen friend requests; and comments and queries
about the books. Initially all of the material was produced by the group
which I was co-ordinating, but soon other girls began to contribute and
a number of new groups were set up in different areas, for example in Scotland
and the West Midlands. As a result of the first issue, though, Journal
editor Joy Wotton and production editor Marie Hryzncak, both publishing
professionals, attended our meeting on Monday 23 October 1995 and introduced
the girls to basic editing and layout skills. This proved to be so popular
that it was repeated at the next meeting, on Monday 19 February 1996. This
latter meeting was also attended by Piers Sandford, current illustrator
of the series, who was interviewed by the girls for the Summer 1996 issue
of the Journal (pictured) before they posed for photographs from
which Sandford would take future cover illustrations. All of these activities
empowered the girls, as they had now become writers and editors as well
as readers, and I felt that this was also in keeping with feminist research
methodology.
dev39
From the beginning, the girls had asked if I could also
organise a residential meeting, where they could recreate some of the atmosphere
of the Chalet School stories. This proved to be more difficult than I had
anticipated, since I had to find a safe, affordable venue, which was within
easy reach of all the members and was available at the same time when they
were. Eventually, though, Moira Lovegrove arranged for us to borrow the
Scout and Guide Hut in Joydens Wood, Bexley, on 25 and 26 May 1996. Four
girls attended, along with Moira Lovegrove. Anne Thompson was unable to
attend, but Annette Jackson, a local Guide Captain, teacher and member
of the New Chalet Club, offered to assist instead. In the event, Annette
took the major role in running the weekend, which made it easier for me
to cope physically and also meant that I was able to spend more time observing
and listening to the girls.
dev40
The hut was centrally heated, with cooking, toilet and
washing facilities, and while there were no showers, in the event of accidents
Moira's home was nearby. As it was a hut, it was easy to rename it The
Chalet for the weekend, and to plan outside activities within the grounds
and the wood. And as the girls had to "camp" within the hut, it satisfied
their desire to "go away camping like the Chalet girls". We divided the
hut into the Speisesaal or dining area; the Hobbies Club (tables
where the girls could work on activities); the Form Room, with chairs in
rows in front of a blackboard; the Dormitory, where the girls laid out
their bedding; and the Splasheries (toilets). Annette and Moira also created
a "Fines Box" for girls caught talking "slang", which added further to
the atmosphere.
dev41
The
girls arrived on Saturday lunchtime, and ate a packed lunch together in
the Speisesaal while they got to know Annette. Joy Wotton then arrived,
and the girls moved over to the Hobbies Club and went over the proofs of
the next issue of The Chalet School Today with her. After that they
moved to the Form Room, where Joy discussed the role of the plays within
Elinor M. Brent-Dyer's books, and the girls talked about their own experiences
of acting, before Joy led the girls in a reading of a play from the Maids
of La Rochelle (1924). Joy then showed the girls how to adapt a play
from scenes in a novel, in this case The Chalet Girls in Camp (1932).
After another meal in the Speisesaal, this time provided by Annette,
the girls went outside for a campfire, where they roasted marshmallows
in order to create "s'mores" with chocolate biscuits, and sang Guide songs
provided by Moira. They then got ready for bed, where they read their Chalet
School books before getting up again for a Midnight Feast.
dev42
On Sunday the girls played a fortune-telling game which
features in the series, jumping over nightlights, and then competed in
a quiz about The Chalet Girls in Camp which had been created for
them by Marie Hrynzcak. Meanwhile Annette and Moira laid a treasure trail
in the grounds, based on events from The Princess of the Chalet School
(1927), which the girls then divided into two teams to follow. After this
the girls returned to the Hobbies Club, where they created two collages
based on the cover of The Chalet Girls in Camp before their parents
collected them.
dev43
In fact, by the middle of 1996 it was becoming increasingly
difficult for me to continue to run the group, since I had moved to Cornwall
and was now in the process of "writing up" the research. The initial contact
with the organised collecting networks had, of course, meant that I had
had to revise the time-scale of the research: the Elinor M. Brent-Dyer
centenary celebrations were due to last until September 1994; and only
then was I able to begin to collate and analyse my findings and to edit
the video record of the research. In addition, I had decided to present
my PhD thesis on computer as a multimedia hypertext or hyperthesis;
my degree would therefore be judged on its presentation as well as its
content, which was appropriate to a "laboratory" subject. The extra workload
had meant that I now planned to submit my research in October 1996, rather
than in 1995 as originally intended. (In the event, prolonged illness and
disability meant that it was nearly a year later than this, in June 1997.)
dev44
I did not wish to abandon the group simply because I had
completed my work, if it meant that the group ceased to continue. However,
by now Moira Lovegrove had reached the age of eighteen, and was representing
the junior members on the New Chalet Club's committee. With extensive experience
as a leader in the Girl Guides, she was well able to carry out a great
deal of the organisation by herself. In addition, Annette Jackson, who
had assisted at the residential weekend, was willing to make a long-term
commitment to the group, and the Club itself was already raising money
to cover the meeting costs which I had previously paid. In fact, I was
no longer the most suitable person to organise the group, and it was now
properly part of the fan movement. The group was therefore integrated into
the Club following the residential weekend, and continued to meet successfully
at the time of writing (1997). Meanwhile I was able to continue with my
involvement with both the girl and the women fans as an "ordinary" member
of their networks, rather than losing contact with my research subjects
as is often the case in more traditional research.
dev45
Dr Ju Gosling aka ju90's ABNORMAL: How Britain became body dysphoric and the key to a cure is available now for just £3.09 for the Kindle or in a limited-edition hardback with full-colour art plates for £20 inc UK postage and packing. |